11 septembre aaron klein abbas abdallah abdallah II abdelkader merah accords d'oslo adam zertal adenauer affaires Ă©trangĂ¨res afghanistan africom afrique afrique du sud ahmadinejad aipac AKP al qaeda al qaida al-arabiya al-fayed al-qaida algĂ©rie algeria aliyah allemagne amĂ©rique america anavad ANC angela merkel ankara ansar dine antisĂ©mitisme antisemitism antizionism apartheid aqmi arabes arabes israĂ©liens arabie saoudite arabs arafat armĂ©e armĂ©niens army ashkenazy assad assemblĂ©e gĂ©nĂ©rale assyriens atatĂĽrk auschwitz autoritĂ© palestinienne autriche-hongrie ayrault azawad Ă©conomie Ă©glise Ă©gypte Ă©lections Ă©tat Ă©tats-unis Ă©vangĂ©liques bachman baker balkans balladur bangladesh bankruptcy banlieues barack obama barak barbares bat yeor bayrou begin beheading beilin belgique belgium benoĂ®t xvi berbĂ¨res bernheim bible biden bill clinton blancs blood libel BNVCA bourgine brĂ©sil brexit britain brzezinski burke bush byzantins cahuzac cameron canada carter Castro cfr chaos charlie hebdo Chavez cheney chiisme chiites china chine chirac chosroes ii chrĂ©tiens christianisme christianity christians church chypre circumcision cisjordanie citizenship claude guĂ©ant clĂ©menceau clermont-tonnerre clinton cnn CNRS colin powell cologne columbia commentary communautĂ© communism communisme confĂ©rence de la paix confrĂ©ries congrĂ¨s conseil de sĂ©curitĂ© conservatism conservative conservatives consistoire constantinople constitution contestation coptes coran corĂ©e du nord corsica crif crime crise crise sociale cuba cuisine cukierman culture daesh daniel johnson daniel pearl david pryce-jones dĂ©mocrates dĂ©mocratie dĂ©mographie de gasperi de gaulle democrats demographics demography desportes dhimmis dhimmitude dieudonnĂ© dinard djihad dollar doxa dreyfus droit international droite droits de l'homme druzes egypte eilat mazar eisenhower election elections emanuel emigration empire ottoman ena enderlin enfants erbakan erdogan espagne etat etats-unis ethnic ethnie EU eurabia eurasia eureka euro europe european parliament european union exode expulsion expulsions fabius facebook far left far right fatah fayĂ§al ferdinand ferhat fethullah gĂĽlen fifth republic fillon finkielkraut flandre flotille fmi FN fondapol food foreign affairs foreign policy france franco frĂ¨res musulmans french french muslims front national frontiĂ¨re internationale fusion antisemitism gates gauche gaza gĂ©nĂ©tique gĂ©nocide gĂ©opolitique genĂ¨se general assembly genocide geopolitics george soros george w. bush george washington germany ghozlan gingrich giscard d'estaing giuliani globalization golden age goldnadel goldstone gorbatchev grande-bretagne grĂ¨ce greece greens grippe espagnole guĂ©ant guĂ©rilla guerre guerre civile guerre de sĂ©cession gurfinkiel hallal halutz hamas hamon haredim harkabi hĂ©breux hekla herzl herzog hezbollah hillary clinton hillel halkin histoire history hitler hollande holocaust holocauste HUJI hungary huntsman hurvah hypercasher ibn saoud icm research idĂ©ologie identitĂ© nationale ifop iforas iiie rĂ©publique ilan halimi immigrants immigration implantations inĂ¶nĂĽ inde ined internet interview irak iran irgoun isabelle ISIS islam islamic state islamism islamisme islamistes islamists israĂ©lites israĂ«l israel israel beiteinu italie ivan de bloch j call j street jabotinsky japon jĂ©rusalem jĂĽnger jean paul II jean-marie le pen jerusalem jewish revival jews jihad jihadism jihadisme jihadistes jihadists john mccain johnson jordanie jour de colĂ¨re judaĂŻsme judĂ©o-christianisme juifs juifs amĂ©ricains juppĂ© kabylie kadhafi kadima kadimah kassam kemal kennedy kerry kgb khamenei khomeini kim kippour kissinger knesset kohl korsia kosher kosher supermarket kosovo kotel kouchner l'express l'obs la paix maintenant laĂŻcitĂ© lapid ldj le drian le monde le nouvel observateur le pen le point lebanon left leftwing Levant liban libĂ©raux liberation libertariens libertĂ© libye liebermann ligne verte likoud livni livres london louis xvi LR lyons macarthur maccain macron magoudi mahmoud abbas mai 1968 mali mandala mandat mandela mao marcion marcionisme marine le pen marines marion marĂ©chal-le pen maroc maronites marseilles massacres massortis mavi marmara mayflower mayotte mĂ©dias mĂ©lanchon mccain media medias mein kampf mer morte mer noire merah meretz mergui merkel mexique michel gurfinkiel middle east migrants migration missiles mitterrand mnla mohamed merah monarchie monarchy monde arabe monde islamique monod mont du temple montauban montebourg montesquieu morocco morsi mosaic moscovici moubarak moyen-orient munich murder muslims musulmans napolĂ©on napoleon naqba nasser natalitĂ© national assembly national front nations unies nato nazis neo-french netanyahu nethanyahu new emerging powers new york new york review of books new york times nicolas sarkozy nixon noĂ«l nobel noirs north america norvĂ¨ge nouvel observateur november 13 NPA nuclĂ©aire obama occident occupation odessa oliganthropie olmert olp onfray onu opinion orban orient orthodoxes oslo otan ottomans pacifisme pahlavi paix pakistan palestine palestinians palestiniens palin panislamisme pape paradigme paradigmes paris paritĂ© parlement europĂ©en partition pĂ©tain pĂ©trole pence peres peripheral france perses peste antonine peste de justinien petraeus peuple juif pew pipes PLO pogrom pogroms poland police politique poll pologne pompidou populism portugal poutine prĂ©sidentielle prĂ©sidentielles premier tour presidential election primaires primaries printemps arabe processus de paix proche-orient prophĂ¨te protestantisme PS pundak putin qaradawi quai d'orsay quartiers quenelle qumran rabbis rabin racism rahm emanuel raid rajoy rasmussen rĂ©formĂ©s rĂ©formes rĂ©fugiĂ©s rĂ©publicains rĂ©volution reagan refugees regional elections religieux religion rempart renaud camus republican pacts republicans restaurants revolution right riots riyad rogers romains romney ron paul roosevelt roquette rosenfeld rouhani royal royaume-uni russia russie rwanda sadate sahara salafistes salem al-fayed sanctuaire du rocher sandler santorum sarah halimi sarkozy saudi arabia savir sĂ©golĂ¨ne royal sĂ©nat sĂ©pharades scandale SCO SDN security council selden senate shafik shalit shalom akhshav shamir sharon shas shoah sionisme sionistes socialist socialists sociĂ©tĂ© society sondages soral soviet union spcj ss staline state nobility state of emergency statism stratĂ©gie strauss-kahn strikes subworlds succession sunnites sweden sykes-picot synagogue syria syrie tahrir tardieu tariq ramadan taubira tel-aviv terre d'israĂ«l terror terrorism terrorisme thatcher the west time tocqueville torah totalitarisme toulouse tourisme travaillistes trevidic tribus trilatĂ©rale truman trump tsahal tsipras tunisie turkey turquie tv ue uk ukraine UMP un unesco union europĂ©enne union pour la mĂ©diterranĂ©e united nations united states unrwa URSS US usa valeurs actuelles valeurs judĂ©o-chrĂ©tiennes valls vatican vĂ©drine ve rĂ©publique versailles veto vichy vietnam violence walter laqueur war washington washington post wastelands west wilson women wright yemen zacharie zapatero
Jeudi 5 juillet 2018
Macron's France, Immigration, and Antisemitism
In 2017, Centrist Emmanuel Macron won by default. One year later, the French crisis is not over.
On the face of it, France is a happy exception in a collapsing European Union. Last year, Emmanuel Macron, a 39 years old centrist and Europhile reformer with little political experience or backing, was unexepectedly elected president. Moreover, he secured one month later an even more stunning victory : La République en Marche (LREM), his hastily improvised political party, garnered 314 seats out of 577 at the National Assembly. Under French constitutional provisions, this is a recipe for a stable and all-powerful « republican monarchy ». Quite a contrast, apparently, with the chaotic politics that bedeviled many other European countries – from Britain to Germany, and from Spain to Italy – in 2016, 2017 and 2018.
But just how real was Macron’s victory ? In many respects, he merely won by default. In the presidential election’s first ballot, on April 23, 2017, he received 24 % of the vote : while this was certainly an achievement for a complete newcomer, three other candidates (the Far Right’s Marine Le Pen, the conservative François Fillon and the Hard Left’s Jean-Luc Mélenchon) reached almost similar levels, a bit over or under 20 %. What helped Macron in the second and decisive ballot, on May 7, where he got 66 %, was that he faced Marine Le Pen, a person most French citizens feel uneasy about. A Macron-Fillon duel or a Macron-Mélanchon duel might have led to a different outcome.
Likewise, the main factor in LREM’s parliamentary victory was a 51 % rate of abstention in the first ballot, on June 11, 2017, and a 57 % rate in the second battot, on June 18. All well considered, the first presidential ballot’s returns, and the fact that 40 % at least of the voters supported Rightwing or Leftwing radicals then, may provide a better clue of long term French political tendancies than the three ensueing electoral returns.
Macron scored some successes during his first year as president. First and foremost, he restored some gravitas to the presidential office – whereas his predecessor, François Hollande, was reviled for his shabbiness. Second, he managed to set up a rather effective cabinet, drawn both from the moderate Left and the moderate Right, but with a slight advantage to the Right (his minister of Education, Jean-Michel Blanquer, openly advocates a return to very traditional educational pratices and a restoration of the teachers’ authority). Third, he started many long-awaited social and fiscal reforms that run against entranched privilege, including unions and bureaucratic privilege. Fourth, he quickly established himself as a world leader, or at least, due to Angela Merkel’s ecclipse, as the last authoritative spokesman for the European Union.
For the time being, such successes have allowed Macron to consolidate his grip on French politics. The social and economic elites have resolved to give him a chance, rather than to bet again on the classic political class. As a result, both the formerly dominant conservative and socialist parties are withering
The dark side is that true opposition to Macron and LREM now stems from the radicals. France Insoumise (« Indomitable France »), Mélenchon’s Hard Left party, has engaged a relentless fight against Macron’s reforms, along with most unions and fringe Trotskyte or anarchistic groups : repeated strikes, demonstrations, street violence. While these tactics may not be enough to derail the reforms, they are likely to have an electoral impact in the longer term. As for the Far Right, it reeled from Marine Le Pen’s defeat in 2017, but then realized that those classic conservative politicians or voters who did not defect to Macron may be interested in a broader New Right coalition. Marine Le Pen may be outflanked in this respect by her very young and very shrewd niece, Marion Maréchal.
Why are Leftwing and Rightwing radicals getting so powerful in contemporary France ? Essentially, they tackle an issue that the classic political class prefers to ignore : the demographic upheaval known as Great Replacement, an expression coined some years ago by a talented if controversial writer, Renaud Camus. Immigration from non-European and non-Judeo-Christian countries, and especially from Muslim countries, has reached such proportions that the gradual replacement of the native populace and culture by a new population and a new culture seems entirely plausible. Leftwing radicals tend to welcome it as a change for the better. Rightwing radicals see it as a cosmic disaster – except for some of them who are ready to strike an alliance with radical Islam in order to topple the « plutocratic » and « Jewish » Western democracy.
In the 635 pages long confession he co-authored in 2016 with journalists Gérard Davet and Fabrice Lhomme, Un président ne devrait pas dire ça (Things A President Should Not Say), former president Hollande admitted that « the French have a problem with Islam, it’s a fact », and that it might lead to a « partition » of the country.
The French Muslim community is the largest and the fastest growing in Europe. In fifty years, from the late 1960’s to the late 2010’s, the population of the Republic of France (including the overseas territories which are as French as Hawaii and Alaska are American) grew from 50 millions to 67 million : a 34 % increase. In the meantime the Muslim population seems to have grown, either naturally or as a result of migrational trends, from 1 million or so to 5 or 6 millions at least : that is to say a 500 % or 600 % increase. As for the ratio of Muslims against the global population, it grew from 2 % to 7 to 9 %.
The real impact of Muslim immigration is even bigger in generational terms : the younger the population, the higher the proportion of Muslims. While less than one tenth of French citizens were Muslims in the 2010’s, proportions were one fifth regarding French citizens or residents under twenty-four, nationwide, and even higher in some places. A 2015 Ipsos investigation in the Greater Marseille area in Southern France found that 25,5 % of the local youths in their mid-teens identified as Muslim. Similar figures were to be found in all other « big cities in France », where most of the population lives.
According to a Fondapol survey released in 2014, the proportion of « strictly religious » French Muslims rose from 27 % in 1994 to 42 % in 2014. To quote again the Ipsos survey on Marseilles, 83 % of the young Muslims describe religion as « something important or very important », against 40 % only of the non-Muslims (and 22 % of the Catholics). Another Ifop survey released in 2016 suggests that 29 % of the French Muslims hold Sharia – the Islamic religious law – as more important than the law of the land, and that 65 % condone the Islamic rules of female « modesty » in the public sphere, including hijab or burka, the Islamic garb, and burkini, the Edwardian-style all-body bathing suit.
What if such views and attitudes foster « no go zones » or de facto enclaves in many parts of the country - or terrorism ? For years, vigilante Muslim groups have set up illegal « street mosques » or enforced Ramadan observance or female modesty in Muslim-populated neighborhoods. Other militant groups have even made inroads in non-Muslim neighborhoods. Systematic harassment of « non-modest » women, either Muslim or non-Muslim, has become commonplace. During the 2018 month of Ramadan (from mid-May to mid-June), dozens of Muslim BDS militants raided supermarkets all over France to impose the removal of Israeli products ; there were also instances where similar gangs assaulted shops and supermarkets in order to break bottles of wine or liquor.
Regarding terrorism, it should be stressed that more than two thousand French Muslims joined the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria in its 2013-2016 heyday, and that French-born jihadists or jihad-inspired thugs killed about 200 people and wounded or maimed 300 people in successive terrorist attacks on French soil : from the murder of soldiers and Jewish teachers and kids in Southern France in March 2012 to the murder of cartoonists and Jewish shoppers in Paris in January 2015, from the killing spree in Paris in November 2015 and Nice in July 2016 to the murder of a 86 years old Catholic priest during the mass a few days later, and from the brutal murder of Sarah Halimi, a 65 years old retired Jewish doctor, in April 2017, to the no less brutal murder of a 85 years old Holocaust survivor, Mireille Knoll, in March 2018.
No wonder that Rightwing columnist Eric Zemmour, whose essay Le Suicide français (The Suicide of France) sold more than 200 000 copies in 2014, steadily warns of a « coming civil war ». Or that one of France’s premium writers, Michel Houellebecq, sold 350 000 copies of Soumission (Submission), a 2015 novel about the election of a « moderate Islamist » as president of France in the 2020’s. Macron’s explicit gamble is to solve the demographic question and prevent the « war of cultures » through a rapid « modernization » of the country. He may also have an agenda within the agenda : rebuilding the government’s authority step by step and reestablishing traditional French and Judeo-Christian culture as fully normative.
French Jews do not feel more comfortable within this context than other European Jews. It may even be argued that they feel less comfortable since they had enjoyed, through the second half of the 20th century a stunning revival, both in demographic and cultural-religious terms.
There were about 300 000 Jews in France in 1945, right after the Holocaust, including some 100 000 thoroughly assimilated or even converted « ex-Jews » who had been been rebranded as Jewish by the Nazis and the collaborationist Vichy regime and were desperately trying to make sense of all that. 75 000 Jews, both French-born and foreign-born, had been rounded up and murdered in Auschwitz from 1942 to 1944. Some 30 000 additional Jews may have perished in various other ways.
In the late 1940’s, tens of thousands of Holocaust survivors from Eastern Europe came to France, most of them as refugees applying for immigration to Palestine or the United States. Many stayed. More refugees came from the Islamic countries in the 1950’s, 1960’s and 1970’s, in the wake of civil disturbance, war, independance or revolution : first from Turkey and Egypt, then from Morocco and Tunisia, then from Algeria, and finally from Iran. In 1962, the Jewish population of France had doubled to 600 000, « ex-Jews » or peripheric Jews not included. By the mid-1970’s, it was said to reach a 700 000 peak.
Such a critical mass allowed for a sudden burgeoning of Jewish religious and cultural identity : synagogues, kosher food, Jewish day schools, Jewish media, Jewish literature (domestic or translated), community centers. France’s geographical proximity with Israel stimulated family tourism, Zionist tours, an eagerness to learn Hebrew. By the mid-1980’s, there was a general revival of Orthodox Judaism in the country, soon to be followed by a growth of Reform and Massorti (Conservative) Judaism. Peripheric Jews who in previous generations tended to intermarry and vanish were suddenly more likely to « return » to Orthodoxy or to join non-Orthodox congregations. The only shadow in this otherwise rosy landscape was, from 1967 on, the French government’s anti-Israel and pro-Arab policies.
The reborn French Jewry was however on a collision course with the rapidly growing and increasingly assertive Muslim community, whatever the good relations that might exist between individual Jews and Muslims or between the religious or intellectual Jewish and Muslim Establishments. Moreover, the unreconstructed anti-Semitism prevalent among many French Muslims helped a hitherto repressed classic non-Muslim anti-Semitism, Right or Left, to come back with a vengeance. By 2000, news from the so called Second Intifada ushered widespread anti-Jewish violence. There were similar outbursts after the Lebanon war of 2006 or the Gaza war of 2014. Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, a French-Cameroonese humorist and anti-Semitic agitator, became a popular idol. And most French Jews felt that the government or the media were more often than not resorting to denial, or even attempting to turn anti-Jewish violence into « inter-communal clashes ».
So much so that the Wandering Jew hit the road again. Thousands left neighborhoods overcome by Muslim radicals or townships ruled by radical Leftwing municipalities to predominantly Christian and conservative places, seen as much safer : all in all, 50 000 Jews are said to have moved from some parts of Greater Paris to some others. Then, there was emigration to Israel, aliyah, another 50 000 souls at least or even 100 000 according to some estimations, over one decade only. Finally, many Jews move to Britain, North America and Australia.
The common factor between these migrations is a lack of trust in the future of France – shared, as a matter of fact, by many Christian or secular French. Another incentive is that once you were raised as a proud and happy Jew, you find it difficult to relapse into a near-marrano status.
© Michel Gurfinkiel & The Jewish Policy Center, 2018
Michel Gurfinkiel, a French public intellectual and editor emeritus of Valeurs Actuelles, is the Founder and President of the Jean-Jacques Rousseau Institute and a Shillman/Ginsburg Fellow at Middle East Forum.
Afficher les commentaires en (Vue non groupĂ©e | Vue groupĂ©e)
Pas de commentaires
L'auteur n'a pas autorisĂ© l'ajout de commentaires pour ce billet.
Pas de rĂ©troliens